Trump has initiated a lawsuit against the former FBI chief. All to create distractions from the Epstein files and failed economic policies.

This lawsuit is remarkable because it's being conducted by a prosecutor who may not even be a prosecutor. Her appointment by the government may be illegal.

Moreover, she is completely inexperienced.

Not only that, but taking on this case required multiple prosecutors. In her own district, not a single prosecutor was willing to take it on because they considered the charges frivolous. A case like that for nothing can cost a prosecutor a career. So she had to shop around, and in another district, there were a few prosecutors who were willing to take it on.

To finalize the case, a grand jury had to approve the indictments. There were three indictments. The grand jury approved two of the three.

Then you have to compile a new list of indictments that is fully supported by the grand jury. The Trump-appointed, and possibly illegal, prosecutor didn't do that, but merely removed the unaccepted indictment and forwarded that part to the judge.

Not only that, but she also mistakenly sent the first indictment, containing the three counts, to the judge.

That first indictment, containing the three counts, was therefore not accepted by the grand jury. The second was never presented to the grand jury, which is unheard of.

I don't see how this case can ever be taken seriously considering how clumsily and stupidly constructed the entire case is. The grand jury may have approved the two indictments, but the case itself is so shady, so flawed, that it could never lead to a conviction, even if a judge were to accept all the prosecutor's mistakes.

This costs enormous amounts of money and achieves absolutely nothing. How much money can be allowed to continue to be spent in the US to distract from the Epstein case?

.
--- SBBSecho 3.31-Linux
* Origin: End Of The Line BBS - endofthelinebbs.com (1:124/5016)